Ici c'est Paris ! Here is paris ! Uniting PSG Fans Worldwide
Mystery Behind Extended Ballon d’Or 2025 Voting Period Raises Questions
Paris, September 2025 – Football enthusiasts are puzzled as the voting process for the prestigious Ballon d’Or 2025 remains open, despite the ceremony being scheduled for September 22. The lingering uncertainty raises questions, especially since the evaluation period concluded in July with the Club World Cup final between PSG and Chelsea.
Ballon d’Or 2025: extended voting period sparks curiosity
The voting period for the Ballon d’Or 2025 spanned from August 1, 2024, to July 31, 2025. On August 7, the nominees were announced, featuring thirty male candidates, including stars like Ousmane Dembélé, Mohamed Salah, and Lamine Yamal. Originally, voting was set to close at the end of August, but according to recent reports, it has been extended to next week. This unexplained delay has left many observers scratching their heads.
Officially, the extension is meant to give voting journalists—one from each of the top 100 FIFA-ranked countries—ample time to analyze the nominees. However, this flexibility could introduce biases. Although September matches fall into the 2025-2026 season and should not influence the decision, recent performances or injuries could sway opinions.
Controversy lingers
Ousmane Dembélé’s situation highlights potential issues. Despite a stellar season, the PSG winger suffered an injury during the September international break. While this should not affect the voting, some journalists might unconsciously alter their assessments. Simultaneously, Lamine Yamal’s September achievements with Spain might leave a lasting positive impression.
This voting deadline controversy is not new. In 2013, a similar extension fueled allegations of favoritism towards Cristiano Ronaldo, leaving Franck Ribéry feeling sidelined. This year, the lack of transparency concerning the exact voting timeline once again stirs discomfort. Ideally, voting should conclude by the end of July, but the organizers continue to favor a prolonged window. This ambiguity, year after year, challenges the credibility of the esteemed award.
